Joint Strike Fighter (news)
While everyone understands the need for a new first line fighter for the Air Force within the next four or five years, the purchase of the JSF continues to show that the Defence leadership in Ottawa is losing its grasp on reality. Yes. a new aircraft is needed. However, there are at least four (more if you add the Mig) aircraft that could meet the AF needs into the 2040 time frame. Consider the F-18 E/F and a few G's to add EW capability. How about the Grippen or the Eurofighter? All these are current, top line, fully supportable aircraft that would surely meet any needs of the AF for many years to come. They are in production now, have proven capabilities, and are more affordable – that should be reason enough for at least a fly-off... > more .
Ottawa,
Canada
US Defense Companies Face ITAR Challenges by Ken Pole (Vol.7, No.2)
Thanks for the article. I've been living with the issues surrounding ITAR for many years while in the CF and for the past 5 yrs as a Defence Contractor and Consultant. I would really like to see an article which also discusses the Controlled Goods Program and how it 'fairs' against the US ITAR rules. My experience to date has indicated that there have been little to no penalties levied on any company or individual for infractions. I also understand the the Controlled Goods Directorate have been on a publicity blitz (travelling across Canada), to let Canadians know more about the program.
Is Ken Pole planning on doing an article on the Canadian equivalent of ITAR - the CGP? I would like to get some information the effectiveness and applicability of the CGP.
Mitch
Principal Engineer, QuinnTsential Consulting
Ontario
CF After Afghanistan by Chris MacLean (Vol.7, No.2)
Your editorial on "After Afghanistan" was right on. Great work.
Roger Beebe
Manitoba, Canada
Lead, Follow, or Get Out of the Way by Hudson (Vol.7, No.2)
This is indeed a piece filled with "perspicacity" - a true assessment of what happened. Two further points could have been added. First, DFAIT believes that good management is centralized management. Consequently nothing happens anywhere until ALL the details have been approved at the most senior level - initiative is considered to be insubordination. Conversely, in the military approach, called "mission command", only broad objectives are given to subordinate commanders who immediately spring into action. In the military, a LACK of initiative is considered to be insubordination. Second, military organization is based on the presumption that unexpected ACTION will indeed be required at some point. The creation of Hillier's new commands were controversial and are, admittedly not the only way to obtain this ACTION. But, in the event, the new Expeditionary Forces Command under LGen Marc Lessard (of Afghanistan renown), was exceptional in generating this ACTION. Ships were moving loaded with supplies, an air bridge was in place, and the required soldiers were on the ground while DFAIT was still agonizing over the development of a policy. Well done.
Terry Liston
Porte de l'Amérique Conseils/Gateway America,
Montréal, Quebec
HUMAN RIGHTS... OR POLITICS? by Chris MacLean (Vol.6 No.6)
Read your editorial in FrontLine Issue 6 earlier today. Right on the money. When are the self interested politicians of this country ever going to wake up and take what's going on in Afghanistan seriously and give it the attention it deserves? Thank you for your forthright assessment.
Tim
Canada
I agree completely with the views you expressed in your last editorial. The Canadians who are taking our government and armed forces to task about torture and other reprehensible acts perpetrated by Afghans are guilty of fuzzy thinking. The Afghan earnings of Canadian taxpayer monies in support of the Canadian Forces may allow them to contribute to all kinds of dastardly activities in addition to the torture of prisoners and abuse of young boys, e.g., ‘honour killings’, fostering drug production and distribution, preventing little girls from going to school, abusing women physically and otherwise, etc., etc. If we were trying to change Afghan culture and values, we would have to take over the country (as the US and UK did in Iraq) and even then I doubt we could succeed. I don’t think the war against terrorism in Afghanistan will be won my military means alone, but it certainly won’t be won without military force. The Canadian Forces are in Afghanistan in an attempt to put the terrorists out of business and that is the required first step in rehabilitating that failed state. Any attempt to export Canadian values before that is achieved is doomed to failure. Let’s not lose sight of the aim, the basic military principle.
MGen (ret) C. LaFrance
Ottawa
Couldn't agree more with your views. Until today I thought I was the only one using the pedophilia toleration argument in this case. The comparison is not perfect in that we do not provide the children yet in both cases we have little choice in tolerating the practice. Its their people. It is tiring to read letters from people insulated for far too long in our peaceful 21st century suburbs bleating about how tolerating torture is against Canadian values and therefore we should turn the world upside down and focus all of our over stretched resources on introspection. We are at war and dealing with a far different culture from ours in an effort to eradicate a common enemy. Your arguments remind us to not lose sight of the aim.
Senior Manager, Business Development
FWSAR by Sharon Hobson (Vol.6 No.6)
Superb job! At last someone has the guts to tell it as it is!
Senior Manager
Business Development
Canada
Interview with COMMODORE JUNG by Chris MacLean (Vol.6, No.5)
Thank-you, thank-you, thank-you for the interview with Commodore Jung. Great article. The kind that underscores the need for journalist and journalism. Glad to hear that others are cluing in to the seriousness of the problem. It gives me hope that TJ's death might have some meaning. And hope is a good thing.
Kris Hatash'ta
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
UNMANNED SYSTEMS by Dewar Donnithorne-Tait (Vol.6, No.5)
In your article on Unmanned Systems, you misidentified a USAF on page 21 as a 737. This aircraft is a 135-series (Boeing 707 variant - four engines vice two on the 737) and at first blush appears to be a special mission aircraft with the upgraded CFN 56 turbofan engines.
(Ed: thanks, we'll get that fixed on our digital edition.)
S Hicks
Ottawa
HUMAN RIGHTS by Chris MacLean (Vol.6, No.5)
I would like to thank you for your editorial in the latest issue of FrontLine (vol 6:5). I hope it will bring more pressure to bear on this issue. My wife and I are appalled that Western Governments continue to prop up President Karzai regime. Here in PEI we would hate to feel that Nichola Goddard’s death was in vain.
Vic Douse
PEI, Canada
I just wanted to say "well done" on your editorial in the most recent FrontLine. Strong words are required and it's great to see the defence community speaking loud and clear to the government. One thing that I have learned in my many years dealing with NATO allies – they listen when Canada speaks.
Sean Hoopey
Ottawa, Canada
I think it's bold for a magazine like FrontLine to be addressing the politically sensitive issues you've raised in your editorial. Some of your readers might squirm a bit. My personal opinion, and the reason why I support Canadian intervention in Afghanistan, is that I believe it's the only hope for the Afghan people. I have four daughters. I think their future is better than anything women in any past era of history could have imagined. I would like to see that for all people including the little girls growing up in Khandahar. But I also recognize that there are thousands of years of cultural momentum behind what is going on in Afghanistan.
Kris Hatash'ta
Ottawa, Canada
HUMAN RIGHTS by Chris MacLean (e-notification)
With homosexuality promoted and subsidized by our Canadian governments... why should anyone care what happens overseas? Charity begins at home! The Third World/Old World does not have their dead buried on our soil defending our God given rights and freedoms! Yet....our dead are buried in numerous graveyards overseas defending theirs.
Thomas
Canada
This is irresponsible use of goverment email. Remove me from your mailing list.
Withheld
Canada
I fully support your initiative and I admire your courage on this matter. I do not think that Canada is the only country to be blamed; all Western countries that are present on the Afghan soil are equally involved. Couldn't you use tools like Facebook to spread the word?
Olivier
Paris, France
Wow. Am I glad to see FrontLine take up this issue. When I was in KAF, this topic was discussed amongst the troops. "Man Love Thursdays" was a given and not something you could publicly disrespect in the name of cultural relativism – like forced marriage or child brides or "honour killing." Hopefully your campaign will force those in power to quit pinching their nostrils and face the stink.
Support Our Troops
Canada
SMALL ARMS by Rob Day (Vol.6 No.4)
I normally read FrontLine on a regular basis, I consider it a valuable public resource. I was quite surprised, therefore, to see the inaccuracies in your article "Recent Trends in Small Arms Development. 1: "the average ‘grunt’ carrying between 1500 and 2000 rounds of ammunition" Fifty mags? Highly unlikely. 2: The Skorpion was available in the 70s, and was far from ‘effective’ as anyone (including myself) who has used it would know. The Ingram appeared slightly later, and the Mini-Uzi not until the 90s. 3: Two important spelling errors: “Tavoq” is presumably the Tavor; “Fantas” assault weapon" is presumably the FAMAS.
Dr Michael Ashkenazi, PhD, Capt. (ret)
SALW Control Program Leader, Bonn International Center for Conversion
D-53113 Bonn, Germany
|